Five Reasons why churches grow.
The simple answer to the question above is that GOD DOES DO
BIG. But the question I am constantly asked by small church leaders is; why do
I have to be big? Why can’t I have a small successful church? On the face of it
these are two very valid questions. But the questions are in my opinion a
deflection of what is going on under the surface. There is often on the part of
these church leaders an inability to grow anything. They don’t know how to, that
is why you get silly statements like “We have quality in our church not
quantity” my question then is why can’t you have both?
If your church is 50 strong in a community of 250000 and you
have been in the area for 25 years, then put simply, you are not doing your
job. Or you are not cut out for the job. (This is a real example)
In the past decade I have had the opportunity to observe
five large and highly successful churches in New Zealand and Australia and have
had the opportunity to talk to their leaders. Here are five reasons why I
believe they have succeeded where others have not. Before we look at these five
things let me say that none of these leaders believed that God does small. They
believe in a big God who is capable of doing big things. From the start they
believed that God could and would do great things. Now I know all over the
Internet there are lists of why people think churches grow and no doubt they
will be more comprehensive than mine, but these are often written by the senior
leaders themselves and have their own bias and slant on things. My list is made
purely as an observer.
Vision:
The first and foremost thing that all these churches had in
common was a vision. Without it they would have had no purpose or direction.
Each leader had a clear understanding of what they believed was God’s vision
for them, their leaders and church, their community and city and in some cases
their nation and beyond.
Vision is broken down into two areas, the ‘here and now’ and
‘the far off’, in all cases there was always a clear defined way of outworking
and accomplishing the vision in the short term and in the long term. The vision
for the present reality was detailed but the future reality was less detailed.
For example the church I go to has the vision statement; “To
rise up the next Generation.” the leadership also has a clearly defined set of
values that lays down the culture of the church and a mission statement that
clearly sets out how they will raise up the next generation. From new converts,
to discipleship programmes to getting the new generation involved in Kingdom
building, this is the detail. But the leadership also see the influence of the
church growing and expanding and so the outworking of the vision has a ‘far
off’ content. This is reflected in multiple campuses in nearby towns and
programmes that will impact these communities for Christ.
The bible says that without a vision a nation will perish.
Even small churches have vision statements like the one of the church that I
attend. The difference is that many of those churches have no clear
understanding of or the will to establish the vision. Many of them tell me God
will do it. Well God left the establishment of the church worldwide to 12
disciples. They did it, what are you doing to instill, generate and outwork the
vision that God has given you for your church. Remember, the smaller your
vision the smaller the result.
Leadership:
The Bible says that “all we like sheep have gone astray each
one to his own way.” Now I know I have taken the scripture out of its context
but the point I want to make here is that all the Senior Leaders of these
churches ensured that all their leaders were on the same page.
For the church to succeed, church leaders cannot work
independently of the vision laid down by the senior leader. To do so would
result in chaos. Each department of the church has a clear understanding of
what the vision is and what their part is in outworking that vision. Their
roles are clearly defined and their objectives are all in line with the vision
and goals of the church. In this way individual kingdoms are discouraged and a
single unified church is built.
If a leader does not agree with the direction the vision is
taking the church and does not want to change, or they don’t feel that they can
change. Then the senior leader has the right to ask them to step down or go
somewhere they will feel more comfortable.
Time:
On the numerous occasions that I visited these five churches
only once did one of the churches go over time. All worked to a schedule, all
had a run sheet; everyone knew what their role for that morning was. If they
advertised a one and a half hour service it ran to that, not 5 or 10 minutes
over time it was exactly on time. What has this to do with whether a church is
successful or not?
Every one of the senior church leaders of the five churches,
all recognised that time was very important to people and how little time
people seemed to have in the modern age. They ensured the following;
1)
They preached for exactly 25-30 minutes.
2)
They started on time.
3)
They recognised the value of the time given to
the church by the volunteers.
When I first arrived in the United Kingdom I visited a
number of churches and was horrified when the preacher’s all preached for well
over an hour. The attitude was that the congregation have come to listen to me.
The attention span of people is rarely more than 20 minutes, especially young
people. The senior leaders of the large successful churches all recognised that
‘less is more’. Their preaching was clear and concise and had great content.
Starting on time is a must. It shows those who attend the
church that you are professional and know what you are about. Too many churches
are haphazard in their starting times. If your Sunday morning service is the
shop window to who you are, then showing visitors that you are good time keepers
will speak volumes to them, they will feel that their own time has not been
wasted.
Many volunteers give more than just a few hours on a Sunday
to a church. The senior leaders of the five churches I studied recognised the
value of the time given by the numerous volunteers.
Volunteers:
All five churches had a large committed group of volunteers
who gave up to three days or nights a week to the church. They were well
trained and did everything with a spirit of excellence; they were like a well
oiled machine. This attitude had been ingrained in the churches from the very
beginning. Did these churches and their cohort of volunteers make mistakes? Yes
they did but they learned by them and ensured that they were better and more
prepared the next time. The attitude of these volunteers was one of commitment
and they did everything with a willing heart and joyful spirit, often for no
reward or recognition. But if their service could help win one person for
Christ then this was reward enough.
On the part of the senior leadership the commitment of the
volunteers was always recognised in various ways. Two churches would have a
person of the week as part of their announcements on a Sunday morning, that
person was called for- even if they were on duty or serving that morning, they
would be brought to the front of the auditorium and publicly thanked for their
service. One church even gave the ‘person of the week’ a bar of chocolate. The
leadership would then come forward and lay hands on and pray for that
volunteer. From my observations this had a twofold effect, one it made the
volunteer feel that they were appreciated and two it showed visitors that the
church looked after and honoured those who served.
All the churches had an end of year dinner- paid for by the
church, for all the volunteers. At this event people were recognised for their
contribution by the various team leaders. Without these committed volunteers
all the church leaders I spoke to said that they would not have been able to
accomplish what they had without them.
Outreach:
You cannot have a church and accomplish what Jesus asked us
to accomplish if we are not reaching out to the lost for Christ. Yet many small churches of 50 or so
congregation size have little or no outreach programmes. When speaking to the
senior leaders of the churches being studied all said that from the very
beginning they had outreach programmes to reach the lost. The bigger they have
grown the more prominent these programmes have become. From small evangelistic
outreaches to Alpha courses, from food banks to night shelters for the
homeless, pre schools and moms and tots days, holiday kids programmes and much,
much more.
Like a businessperson who starts a business and tries
various things until they find the one thing that works, so to in the churches not
all the programmes and courses introduced worked, so were canned for another
better program. The focus was always we have a calling and a vocation to reach
out to a lost and broken world with the message of the cross and an answer to
their problems, Jesus.
Comments
Post a Comment